We can use fpc1 to reduce the cost. We’re just starting to look like the stretch wrapping might look like a luxury, and some people might think it’s “need” rather than “need.” Those who don’t think it’s necessary may be people who don’t need to wrap their hands all day. What they don’t understand is that machines can pay for themselves in a variety of ways. Labor. Valuable time can be vacated by automation, allowing people to engage in other tasks that require critical thinking. And productivity function can also be increased a lot, for example, additional and automatic cutting film, for example, you will be the machine configuration to the degree of automation of you want is allowed, it is not possible before. Thin film. Different degrees of pre-stretching are provided by modern film delivery systems. Pre-stretching can increase production per volume, and your consumables can be saved a lot. For example, 200 percent of pre-stretching can change the film, which can turn 6,000 feet of film into 18,000 feet. Let’s look at the damage. Hidden is the cost of loss, because the topic is a topic that most of us want to avoid. The truth is that damage can happen, and, in a way, it’s too powerful to ignore the harm that this damage does. In 2008, a joint study was published by the food and grocery manufacturers’ association (GMA), the food marketing research institute (FMI) and Deloitte Consulting, and the underlying causes of the non-sale products were also discovered. According to the survey, 05% of the products that can’t be sold are caused by damage. If, now you have 30 pieces of goods on hand, need to ship 1 million dollars a year in the product, so, in five years, $41715 can be saved, you switch to a machine automatic cutting film is what you only need to do, and there are 200% of the pre-tension.